I’ve actually wanted to rant about her for a while now, so here I go. Ugh, I can’t stand the fact that the only good thing Alexis ever has to say about uncut dicks is that they’re good/better for anal. She’s not wrong, but can you at least say that they’re better for other reasons, too? Can you at least say they’re better because they’re more aesthetically pleasing to look at or they’re more fun to play with or they feel better for vaginal as well? I don’t like the implication that my foreskin is only useful when my dick is being shoved up your crapper.
I also don’t like that she never seems to want to spend more than 5 seconds on the question of cut vs uncut. She’ll ask the question, get a brief answer, and then immediately want to move on to the next question. Like, bro, it’s the only interesting question out of all the dumb questions you’re going to ask, so why spend so little time on it? Try to get your guests to expound on it. Ask them what exactly they prefer about uncut dicks, what differences they find between a cut vs uncut dick, how they compare, etc. Don’t just get their 3-word answer and then go “Uncut is better for anal, and only very, very, very, very specifically anal in particular and literally nothing else. YOU HEAR THAT, ALL YOU UNCUT FELLAS OUT THERE?! YOUR DICKS ARE ONLY GOOD FOR FUCKING THE BIOLOGICAL EQUIVALENT OF A WASTE FACTORY! NOTHING ELSE!” Sorry, got a bit carried away there.
That’s honestly one of my biggest pet peeves: When women claim to like/prefer uncut dicks (or are against circumcision), but are still so ignorant about foreskin. These same types of women will say they love foreskin and/or are against circumcision, and then will say/imply something negative and insulting about uncut dicks 2 seconds later. Of course, they’d never say anything negative/insulting about circumcised dicks, though. It’s just tiring. Like, dude, learn how a fucking preference works. You don’t even know how to prefer something correctly. Seriously, how do you even fuck that up?
