Deadheart Your inadvertent bias is astonishing, you’re 1st of all with regards to lubrication. You mentioned that you can move the skin pa’s the glans and you like it that way, the thing is most cut men prefer the opposite and like stimulating the glans directly, which is something that cannot be realistically done without lube as you indicated yourself, that is where the cut men need lube to masturbate FACT comes into focus.
As most people prefer the stimulation of their glans when masturbating, be it the glans penis for men glans clitoris for women . Which is a reality you are oblivious to, and it hence makes you an exception. Calling the near addiction of cut men to lube a myth is a sign of voluntary escapism through ignorance.
You are here conforming your preferences to you capabilities instead of the other way around and then dressing them as breakthroughs. This is a demonstration of a core principle of biases.
2nd point is with regards to the sensitivity, it is obvious that stimulating the glans directly years before your circumcision will have an effect on your penile sensations and hence blur the lines of your experiences before and after circumcision, that does not change the fact that sexual sensitivity and pleasure are massively impacted, a better frame of reference then would be to compare your sensitivity before and after your started touching the glans directly, them you will notice a considerable difference.
Furthermore you actively sought out this desensitisation and administered it yourself, just because you could understand these basic biological principles and chronology doesn’t mean that others will be so enthusiastic about conniving themselves into ignoring fact and feigning ignorance to suit their fetishism and its associated illusions.
Essentially you voluntarily started the process of desensitisation and ruined your genitals and perception of sexuality years before your mutilation and then pretended that just because there was no real difference just before and after your circumcision you then conned yourself into declaring and believing that circumcision has no real effects and that even if there are any effects you like them so it then it simply must be true and that others must like them as well and if anyone disagrees then they are merely detractors for the sake of dissension.
And here you are conforming your evidence and tests to your desired outcome and stating them as fact, another exercise of bias for the second time in this thread alone.
