Squirrel wrote
povonly wrote
People seem to misunderstand my point. In a lot of porn movies, for some reason, they implement a "sharp" edit technique which follows a big build-up of introduction and talk and then "flash" it jumps maybe two minutes later and misses the BEGINNING of the action. This does not make sense to me. Other videos just jump into mid-action without any start-up at all. This is nothing but lazy film-making. Of course you can excuse it slightly for amateur couples making sex tapes but I'm talking about professionals here. Why do people accept this?
I agree with your sentiment but it isn't necessary to restate it over and over again.
Many times that footage has actually been shot but has been cut in the editing process. My personal theory is that someone doesn't think that the audience will want to look at a flaccid penis. This seems to especially be the case when the male actor is uncircumcised in US porn.
yeah i came to a similar conclusion at some point. i remember for the first few years of watching porn i never even saw (or at least never noticed) an uncircumcised man, and i was floored when i did. and then it was still more years before i ever saw a soft dick that wasn't cut
then again, it's somewhat rare (and used to be more rare) to see any soft dicks in porn regardless of whether they're cut or not. AND there are some guys who immediately pull back their foreskin when the cameras come on them, as if they're embarrassed to be uncut
