True Phimosis

circhead

( [Login to see the link] [Login to see the link] )
I never heard the term “false phimosis” or “pseudo phimosis” until this Japanese diagram.
What I find interesting is, as you will see in the these diagrams, true phimosis means never retracting. The foreskin is supposed to go back when erect and if it doesn’t that’s true phimosis. So what if all you guys that like skin up actually want phimosis and didn’t know it? If your skin goes back it’s acting properly. If not you’re like me and a ton of other guys and have some sort of phimosis or tight foreskin and frenulum.

If you’re foreskin goes back when erect, and you need to train it to stay up when erect, or even still cover the head, then you are technically training yourself to have phimosis?

This one is in Japanese and English. Look closely for the English please.

This one is saying “Male circumcision solves men’s worries! False phimosis, paraphimosis, true phimosis.”
It’s in order. It’s erect penis first with False phimosis, paraphimosis, and true phimosis. And the last character is circumcised.

neezduts*24896

This whole thing is false, it was just some marketing gimmic cooked up by some private circumcision clinics in Japan to sell their product as it wasnt popular, but first they had to manufacture a problem.

First off in the 1st (top) diagram in the 1st image they claim that according to them a normal penis should always have the foreskin retracted and the glans exposed, even when flaccid. This alone exposes their biases and lack of knowledge.

2nd of all the definition of phimosis as stated by the international medical community as well as the Japanese department/ministry of health is the inability to retract the foreskin and nothing else. The definition and classification is based on the functional capacity of the foreskin, not on its position and aesthetic. Correlation is not causation. So if you’re foreskin can be retracted you do not have phimosis as per recognised definition and parameters.

3rd of all why would having a covered foreskin on erection be a bad thing? You get more flexibility on the position of your foreskin with which you can regulate the level of stimulation you are receiving and hence you can regulate your stamina. Plus during penetration (be it outer or intercourse) the foreskin gets automatically pulled back anyways so no functional issue there either.

This is just a marketing scam, and of those people who actually made those claims, most of them would not be able to hold their own in a discussion on this topic of foreskin positioning.

circhead

neezduts*24896 Let’s not get caught up in all the fake circumcision stuff, that’s not what this is about. You can say that about anything.
Also the first image is circumcised. You know how people act like a normal penis is one without foreskin. Look at the very tip. And then look at pic 3. Normal = no foreskin, always out. Same mindset as the US, you know “uncircumcised”.
But again, I don’t care about that. I’m just posting this about the false/pseudo phimosis thing. Like it’s somewhere in between.
And the skin completely covering during erection is not the norm though. We can all do what we want but that’s not how it’s supposed to be. It’s supposed to go back, that’s how it was intended, but if someone doesn’t want that that’s fine. I just think its interesting that if it is up when erect, that’s phimosis, so some guys actually want phimosis or some version of it.
Let’s forget the whole uncut and cut thing. Sometimes our fetishes and biases kinda block our vision so to say. Even when intact, the pleasure (the intended pleasure) is from the skin rolling back allowing you the underside, the band and keeping things smooth and friction-less. So if its completely covering the head that’s still not how it’s “supposed to be” as circumcised is not how it’s “supposed to be”. You see what I mean?
But I hope this whole thing doesn’t turn into a completely opposite discussion than I intended. That honestly happens too often. I can ask one question about particular issue and before I know it you got 20 comments talking about how their lovers never complained and girls do this or that. It’s not always about that.
Thanks for the response though.

neezduts*24896

circhead Again I never commented on the circ status of the 1st, i simply mentioned the concept of the exposed glans and seprarately a retracted foreskin if visible. You’re forgetting that the Japanese have a culture of retracting the foreskin even until it atrophies. Also you can see no scar line for the1st one as they made it ambiguous. But the principle that I was pointing out still stands in that they view a normal penis to have an exposed glans even when soft. Thas is abnormal. Also what is the basis of assuming that the foreskin should autoretract? You’re penis literally has less options and skin flexibility, bit the same factors of considerarion as a penis with a foreskin that covers then glans even when erect. Literally most, of not a large majority of the intact male population has a foreskin that stays protracted on election until moved otherwise. As for the phimosis point please Google what a definition is and how etymology works.

drat

Yeah I always wished my foreskin self retracted when erect and stayed retracted until my erection faded but those aren’t the cards I was dealt 🙂

circhead

neezduts*24896 i get you

dc57dc

Drat I am sure that you and I are not unusual. my foreskin never automatically retracted on its own. my foreskin didn’t even retract until I was in my mid teens.

mine has always needed a bit of help to retract,. When I was younger sex started with the foreskin forward and after coming ended up with the skin retracted.

now, my foreskin seldom retracts even during sex unless it has help, so to speak. one of the nicest things is if my wife slips her fingers between us and holds the skin back tight.

I have always been fascinated by the difference in cocks, but a false sense of reality as porn actors don’t have normal sized or everyday cocks.

Just my humble opinion!

lcburgundy

The ambiguity of the term phimosis and its improper use/translation in Japanese porn, combined with persistent pixelization of Japanese porn, makes Japanese porn an absolute wasteland if you’re looking for phimosis porn.

circhead

lcburgundy yea and all the uncensored japanese porn is apparently shot in korea with either japanese or korean guys, but whatever the case, they are circumcised 99.99% of the time because korea, because of their history with the US, is the only other country that performs RIC. so you never know if its a japanese guy or korean guy.