Correlation Foreskin Length & Country / Ethnics

Leila94 · 2019-03-28T13:23:06+00:00

I have a pretty interesting question: I traveled a lot the last 2 years and dated guys of 9 or 10 different nationalities altogether in my life. Born in th...

Squirrel

MAGA4SKIN24 This is why Japanese porn is the some of the worst in the world. Retractable foreskin age varies and all children are born with Phimosis…

Utter rubbish. The citations from Adachi are all from “Ueber den Penis der Japaner” which was published in 1902.

“Every Japanese entering maturity asks himself in the beginning why his glans is not completely free like that of other adults, and in this way arrives at an unfortunate suspicion of the naturalness of his own member. He therefore shoves the foreskin back.” - I doubt that a blanket statement such as this was even true back then; it certainly isn’t 120 years later.

I’ve been to Japan and while I didn’t spend a lot of time checking out penises, I did visit a sauna on a couple of occasions and I didn’t notice any guy trying to keep his foreskin back. The oldest in the sauna would’ve been mid-40s so maybe some of the older generation might do it but it’s not universal.

neezduts*24896

Squirrel I agree. If you look at most recent uncensored Japanese porn videos. most of the current generation, like the millennial onwards have normal foreskins and a normal position of them.And their women seem to love playing with them as well.

srs5020

I’m American born and raised in Pennsylvania…I wasn’t circumcised at birth and was a CI-9.5 until getting cut in my early 20’s…I’m now about a CI-2.5

JL0101

neezduts*24896

that would be good news, i don’t watch it very often, because it annoys me that most of the time the japanese guys have it back and it’s never used. do you have some recommendations where i can see what you describe?

a2mlover2222

Just from porn, I can agree German men tend to have longer foreskin, also Italians. There’s two guys from Romania that I’ve seen with the longest foreskins. Is it possible they are stretching on it? Often men will pull it outwards while jerking off.

MAGA4SKIN24

Circumcision in Man and Women translated by David Berger Page 227. "The Greeks had a special contrivance, the Kynodesme, a colored thread, with which they bound up the foreskin at the tip of the penis. The Greek appeared in this penis costume especially at the gymnastic games. It is re- markable that even the Japanese, who otherwise never appear “kawakamuri”, draw the foreskin down as far as possible over the glans in wrestling bouts and “cover it all over with the scrotum”, because the superstition is prevalent that all the strength of the body evaporates through the uncovered glans. (Adachi, p. 356.) In South America also a kind of kynodesme occurs. Von den Steinen (p. 192) derives the custom from the hip-band under which the foreskin, drawn up along the abdomen, is placed. “The hip-band serves the purpose of elongating the prepuce. The penis is placed upwards against the body and thus slipped under the hip-band so that the upper portion of the prepuce is pinched off.

The youth is urged to practice this procedure as soon as he is capable of erection”. The Trumai tied up “the prepuce in front of the glans with a piece of cotton thread usually colored red with urukin.

The front end of the penis looked like the tip of a sausage.

Thus they possessed permanently what the others had only temporarily with the help of the hip-band”.

In men without this thread von den Steinen noticed “a mark of alinement caused by this custom”. Among the Mandan also those youths taking part in the sun dance and many representing animals had their prepuce tied over the glans at this festival."

veigus

MAGA4SKIN24 do you have a link to the pdf of the book?

MAGA4SKIN24

veigus [Login to see the link]

Squirrel

veigus You might also be interested in reading an authoritative review so that you can see that it’s not only me who thinks that it’s complete tosh. Also, bear in mind that the book was published in 1931 and cites anthropological papers from the 1800’s and early 1900’s - with all the apparent biases of a “superior” westerner looking at “foreigners and all their funny practices”.

Illustrative excerpts from the review:

The result of this is that the author becomes lost in his own maze : the very multiplicity of the customs bewilders him, and he ends by coming to few new conclusions at all.

According to the author, circumcision of the male arose partly at least from the desire to imitate domestic and other animals which were observed in copulation. To this was added the supposed desire on the part of early man to increase the ease of the process in himself, and the recognition of the hindrance a partial or total phimosis caused to him.

It is an epitome of current theories and we cannot pretend that these are convincing. Circumcision still awaits its shrewd interpreter.

Here’s the whole review:
[Login to see the link]

justblank

Kinda related would you could magically have a bigger dick or a long overhang what would you choose? Personally I would rather have more overhang.

MAGA4SKIN24

justblank

"Many pieces of ancient Greek artwork depict scenes of naked men endowed with quite lengthy foreskins. More importantly they practiced the cultivation of the prepuce and the longer the foreskin the more desired it seemed to be whilst a mega [Greek: mega = large] prepuce or very large foreskin was the epitome of a desirable penis. As previously mentioned the term for the generous abundance of foreskin at the end of the penis is called the acroposthion. Maybe it is the acroposthion then, in all its unashamed obviousness is what’s seen to be the undesirable element by those who advocate universal circumcision, because it is precisely therein this protrusion that lays the source of blissful and intense pleasurable sensations.

In his publication for ‘The Bulletin of the history of medicine’ entitled ‘The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece’, Frederick. M Hodges documents the preputial aesthetics of the Ancient Greeks, who valued and prized the prepuce on its own merits while simultaneously associating it with other aspects of male beauty. They valued the longer, tapered foreskin as a reflection of a deeper ethos involving cultural identity, morality, propriety, virtue, beauty and health. They also characterized a penis with a short or inadequate foreskin as deficient or defective, especially one that had been surgically removed under their disease concept of lipodermos [Greek = lacking skin]."

[Login to see the link]

justblank

[Login to see the link]

That’s cool but I’ve seen that already. That seems to be like the only website on overhang, never mind anything erotic with the exception of that Japanese series. I wish it would take off as a fetish but a niche within a niche is tough. Maybe she thinks so -[Login to see the link] See 1;20. It’s been posted before but here it is again.

MAGA4SKIN24

justblank

“Ancient Greeks recognized two distinct component of the prepuce: the portion that covers the glans was known as posthe and the tapering portion that hangs beyond the limits of glans was called akroposthion. They considered akroposthion aesthetically pleasing and depicted their heroes with small penis and megaprepuce. Keeping up with the tradition, even renaissance artists like Michelangelo (1475–1564 CE) sculpted David and Jesus with intact prepuce contrary to the unambiguous Biblical description of their circumcision. In ancient Greece, public exposure of the glans, but not the penis per se, was condemned as indecent. Olympic athletes took part in competitive games in full nudity; but they cautiously protected their modesty by wearing ‘kynodesme’, a string that strapped the tip of prepuce with waist band thereby preventing accidental exposure of glans. An intact prepuce was considered a proof of male virginity much analogous to an intact hymen of females. As a long prepuce was commended a sign of aristocracy, men wanted to elongate their ‘akroposthion’ by infibulation, a method of stretching prepuce. Greek physicians such as Aulus Cornelius Celsus (25 BCE to 50 AD) and Oribasius (325–403 AD) described meticulous techniques of infibulations wherein the prepuce is stretched, pierced and transfixed with a strut (fibula). Lengthening of the prepuce was facilitated by suspending specially designed graded weights (Pondus Judaeus) from the fibula or by periodic proximal relocation of the fibula (Fig. 2.7)” Page 56

“In his study, Gallo L. founded that an excessive prepuce is very common in patients with lifelong PE: overall 59.1% of patients complaining of PE had an excessive prepuce. This high prevalence may reflect a scientific explanation in that men with an excessive prepuce have higher penis sensitivity, as the foreskin, as extensively discussed before, is the most sensitive part of the human penis.” Page 337

“Foreskin types were classified according to its length as: Long (with the preputial orifice located beyond glans meatus and entirely covering the glans) Medium (with the preputial orifice located between meatus and glans corona), Short (with the preputial orifice located between corona and coronal sulcus) we can appreciate the wide normal variation in the length of the preputial tip (The part of the prepuce extended from the preputial ring proximally to the level of urinary meatus)” Page 330

intact

Michelangelo (1475–1564 CE) sculpted David and Jesus with intact prepuce contrary to the unambiguous Biblical description of their circumcision

The author seems to have missed the part about Biblical circumcision being less invasive than that of post-Jesus’ time.

Pre-140 A.D., the Jewish tradition was to [Login to see the link]. A circumcised male could pass for uncircumcised, assuming he didn’t have an erection and perhaps tugged his foreskin a bit before getting nude. This became a problem for Jewish high priests trying to prevent their men from mingling too easily with Greeks in the gymnasiums.

MAGA4SKIN24

intact “Close to the end of Common Era, Greco-Roman intolerance towards circumcision reached a new dimension. Antiochus IV Epiphanes (circa 215–164 BCE), the Hellenistic king of the Seleucid Empire made circumcision a punishable offence. Jewish parents who circumcised their wards were flogged, crucified or hanged along with the circumcised child. This repression is said to be the cause of Maccabean Revolt (167 to 160 BCE) and the ensuing 7 battles which eventually led to the victory of Jews [13]. Hanukkah is the Jewish festival that celebrates this victory. Titus Flavius Vespasian (9–79 CE) the Roman emperor outlawed ritual circumcision as he considered it barbaric. This resulted in the Great Jewish Revolt (66–73 CE). However, Vespasian suppressed it with brutal force and revenged by imposing Fiscus Judaicus, a new tax to be paid by all circumcised Jewish men. For the purpose of tax collection, every year Jewish men had to strip before an appointed officer who ascertained their circumcision status. For this reason, it is popularly known as circumcision tax. Vespasian’s hatred towards circumcision was such that he even executed his own nephew Titus Flavius Clemens for undergoing the Jewish ritual. Bar Kokhba revolt (circa 132–136 CE) was precipitated when Publius Aelius Hadrianus (76–138 CE), the Roman emperor enacted laws to abolish circumcision.” Page 57

“During the times of the Old Testament brit milah was the method of circumcision. As only the tip of prepuce was removed in this method, Jewish young men easily grew back the foreskin by infibulation. They primarily did it to appear uncircumcised to the Greeks so as to secure opportunities of job, trade and participation in Olympic Games. Rabbies, who did not like this, introduced periah (complete excision of the prepuce) thereby making reversal of circumcision difficult. In their frenzy to prevent reversal of circumcision, rabbies advocated a procedure called synechotomy in which considerable amount of shaft skin was also excised.” Page 63

justblank

JL0101

People might get annoyed to see the same link again on the same discussion so see to my post 18 days ago (11/20/24). It is censored but censored porn with that long of a overhang is better than uncensored with a normal overhang imo.

« Previous Page